↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Increasing Visual Search Accuracy by Being Watched

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
Title
Increasing Visual Search Accuracy by Being Watched
Published in
PLOS ONE, January 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0053500
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yuki Miyazaki

Abstract

In daily life, huge costs can arise from just one incorrect performance on a visual search task (e.g., a fatal accident due to a driver overlooking a pedestrian). One potential way to prevent such drastic accidents would be for people to modify their decision criterion (e.g., placing a greater priority on accuracy rather than speed) during a visual search. The aim of the present study was to manipulate the criterion by creating an awareness of being watched by another person. During a visual search task, study participants were watched (or not watched) via video cameras and monitors. The results showed that, when they believed they were being watched by another person, they searched more slowly and accurately, as measured by reaction times and hit/miss rates. These findings also were obtained when participants were videotaped and they believed their recorded behavior would be watched by another person in the future. The study primarily demonstrated the role of being watched by another on the modulation of the decision criterion for responding during visual searches.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 47 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 24%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 14%
Student > Master 6 12%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Professor 4 8%
Other 11 22%
Unknown 5 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 32 65%
Social Sciences 3 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 7 14%