| Title |
Consumption with Large Sip Sizes Increases Food Intake and Leads to Underestimation of the Amount Consumed
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0053288 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dieuwerke P. Bolhuis, Catriona M. M. Lakemond, Rene A. de Wijk, Pieternel A. Luning, Cees de Graaf |
| Abstract |
A number of studies have shown that bite and sip sizes influence the amount of food intake. Consuming with small sips instead of large sips means relatively more sips for the same amount of food to be consumed; people may believe that intake is higher which leads to faster satiation. This effect may be disturbed when people are distracted. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 45 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 13 | 29% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 16% |
| Netherlands | 6 | 13% |
| Spain | 2 | 4% |
| Australia | 2 | 4% |
| Singapore | 1 | 2% |
| Belgium | 1 | 2% |
| Norway | 1 | 2% |
| Senegal | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 10 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 28 | 62% |
| Scientists | 12 | 27% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 2 | 3% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 1% |
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 64 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 12% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 17% |
| Unknown | 11 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 14 | 20% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 14 | 20% |
| Unknown | 20 | 29% |