↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

How Often Are Ineffective Interventions Still Used in Clinical Practice? A Cross-Sectional Survey of 6,272 Clinicians in China

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
How Often Are Ineffective Interventions Still Used in Clinical Practice? A Cross-Sectional Survey of 6,272 Clinicians in China
Published in
PLOS ONE, March 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0052159
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xiao-Min Luo, Jin-Ling Tang, Yong-Hua Hu, Li-Ming Li, Yan-Ling Wang, Wei-Zhong Wang, Li Yang, Xiao-hui Ouyang, Guang-cai Duan

Abstract

The World Health Organization reported in 2011 that irrational use of medicines was a serious global problem that is wasteful and harmful. The worst is use of ineffective or harmful interventions which should not be used at all. However, little is known about the changes that 20 years of evidence-based medicine has made particularly in reducing use of ineffective interventions. We surveyed clinicians in China to show how often ineffective interventions were still used in practice.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 31%
Researcher 3 23%
Professor 1 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Student > Postgraduate 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 23%
Psychology 2 15%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 8%
Neuroscience 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 38%