↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Sequential Tool Use in Great Apes

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
11 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
Title
Sequential Tool Use in Great Apes
Published in
PLOS ONE, December 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0052074
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gema Martin-Ordas, Lena Schumacher, Josep Call

Abstract

Sequential tool use is defined as using a tool to obtain another non-food object which subsequently itself will serve as a tool to act upon a further (sub)goal. Previous studies have shown that birds and great apes succeed in such tasks. However, the inclusion of a training phase for each of the sequential steps and the low cost associated with retrieving the longest tools limits the scope of the conclusions. The goal of the experiments presented here was, first to replicate a previous study on sequential tool use conducted on New Caledonian crows and, second, extend this work by increasing the cost of retrieving a tool in order to test tool selectivity of apes. In Experiment 1, we presented chimpanzees, orangutans and bonobos with an out-of-reach reward, two tools that were available but too short to reach the food and four out-of-reach tools differing in functionality. Similar to crows, apes spontaneously used up to 3 tools in sequence to get the reward and also showed a strong preference for the longest out-of reach tool independently of the distance of the food. In Experiment 2, we increased the cost of reaching for the longest out-of reach tool. Now apes used up to 5 tools in sequence to get the reward and became more selective in their choice of the longest tool as the costs of its retrieval increased. The findings of the studies presented here contribute to the growing body of comparative research on tool use.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Denmark 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Austria 1 2%
Unknown 62 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 20%
Student > Master 9 14%
Researcher 8 12%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 12 18%
Unknown 15 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 26%
Psychology 16 24%
Neuroscience 5 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Arts and Humanities 2 3%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 17 26%