↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Misconduct Policies in High-Impact Biomedical Journals

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
22 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
68 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
Title
Misconduct Policies in High-Impact Biomedical Journals
Published in
PLOS ONE, December 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0051928
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xavier Bosch, Cristina Hernández, Juan M. Pericas, Pamela Doti, Ana Marušić

Abstract

It is not clear which research misconduct policies are adopted by biomedical journals. This study assessed the prevalence and content policies of the most influential biomedical journals on misconduct and procedures for handling and responding to allegations of misconduct.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Nigeria 2 2%
Netherlands 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
India 1 1%
Saudi Arabia 1 1%
Unknown 90 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 15%
Researcher 11 11%
Student > Master 11 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 8%
Professor 6 6%
Other 28 28%
Unknown 20 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 21%
Social Sciences 13 13%
Arts and Humanities 6 6%
Philosophy 5 5%
Computer Science 4 4%
Other 22 22%
Unknown 28 28%