↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Implementation of Provider-Based Electronic Medical Records and Improvement of the Quality of Data in a Large HIV Program in Sub-Saharan Africa

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
141 Mendeley
Title
Implementation of Provider-Based Electronic Medical Records and Improvement of the Quality of Data in a Large HIV Program in Sub-Saharan Africa
Published in
PLOS ONE, December 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0051631
Pubmed ID
Authors

Barbara Castelnuovo, Agnes Kiragga, Victor Afayo, Malisa Ncube, Richard Orama, Stephen Magero, Peter Okwi, Yukari C. Manabe, Andrew Kambugu

Abstract

Starting in June 2010 the Infectious Diseases Institute (IDI) clinic (a large urban HIV out-patient facility) switched to provider-based Electronic Medical Records (EMR) from paper EMR entered in the database by data-entry clerks. Standardized clinics forms were eliminated but providers still fill free text clinical notes in physical patients' files. The objective of this study was to compare the rate of errors in the database before and after the introduction of the provider-based EMR.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 141 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ethiopia 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Ukraine 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Unknown 135 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 20%
Researcher 21 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 14%
Student > Postgraduate 10 7%
Student > Bachelor 8 6%
Other 22 16%
Unknown 32 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 48 34%
Computer Science 18 13%
Social Sciences 10 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 4%
Other 14 10%
Unknown 41 29%