↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Unexpected Strong Polygyny in the Brown-Throated Three-Toed Sloth

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
8 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
10 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
95 Mendeley
Title
Unexpected Strong Polygyny in the Brown-Throated Three-Toed Sloth
Published in
PLOS ONE, December 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0051389
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jonathan N. Pauli, M. Zachariah Peery

Abstract

Promiscuous mating strategies are much more common than previously appreciated. So much so, that several authors have proposed that promiscuity is the "rule" rather than the exception in vertebrate mating systems. Decreasing species mobility and increasing habitat fragmentation have both been suggested to reduce the "polygyny potential" of the environment and promote other mating strategies like promiscuity in females. We explored the social and genetic mating system for one of the most sedentary extant mammals, the brown-throated three-toed sloth (Bradypus variegatus), within a highly fragmented Neotropical habitat. Surprisingly, we found that three-toed sloths were strongly polygynous, with males excluding male competitors from their core ranges, and exhibiting strong reproductive skew. Indeed, only 25% of all resident adult males sired offspring and one individual sired half of all sampled juveniles. Paradoxically, a sedentary life-history strategy seems to facilitate polygyny in fragmented landscapes because multiple females can persist within small patches of habitat, and be monopolized by a single male. Our work demonstrates that strong polygyny can arise in systems in which the polygyny potential should be extremely low, and other strategies, including promiscuity, would be favoured. Mating systems can be influenced by a multitude of factor and are dynamic, varying among taxa, over time, and across habitats; consequently, mating systems remain difficult to predict based on general ecological principles.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 4%
Brazil 2 2%
Czechia 1 1%
Unknown 88 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 17%
Student > Master 14 15%
Student > Bachelor 14 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 14%
Student > Postgraduate 4 4%
Other 11 12%
Unknown 23 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 46 48%
Environmental Science 6 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 25 26%