↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Digital Surveillance: A Novel Approach to Monitoring the Illegal Wildlife Trade

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
8 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
289 Mendeley
Title
Digital Surveillance: A Novel Approach to Monitoring the Illegal Wildlife Trade
Published in
PLOS ONE, December 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0051156
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amy L. Sonricker Hansen, Annie Li, Damien Joly, Sumiko Mekaru, John S. Brownstein

Abstract

A dearth of information obscures the true scale of the global illegal trade in wildlife. Herein, we introduce an automated web crawling surveillance system developed to monitor reports on illegally traded wildlife. A resource for enforcement officials as well as the general public, the freely available website, http://www.healthmap.org/wildlifetrade, provides a customizable visualization of worldwide reports on interceptions of illegally traded wildlife and wildlife products. From August 1, 2010 to July 31, 2011, publicly available English language illegal wildlife trade reports from official and unofficial sources were collected and categorized by location and species involved. During this interval, 858 illegal wildlife trade reports were collected from 89 countries. Countries with the highest number of reports included India (n = 146, 15.6%), the United States (n = 143, 15.3%), South Africa (n = 75, 8.0%), China (n = 41, 4.4%), and Vietnam (n = 37, 4.0%). Species reported as traded or poached included elephants (n = 107, 12.5%), rhinoceros (n = 103, 12.0%), tigers (n = 68, 7.9%), leopards (n = 54, 6.3%), and pangolins (n = 45, 5.2%). The use of unofficial data sources, such as online news sites and social networks, to collect information on international wildlife trade augments traditional approaches drawing on official reporting and presents a novel source of intelligence with which to monitor and collect news in support of enforcement against this threat to wildlife conservation worldwide.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 289 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 2%
South Africa 3 1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Botswana 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Nepal 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 272 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 50 17%
Student > Master 47 16%
Researcher 46 16%
Student > Bachelor 37 13%
Other 26 9%
Other 35 12%
Unknown 48 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 78 27%
Environmental Science 74 26%
Social Sciences 30 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 8 3%
Other 39 13%
Unknown 51 18%