↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Online Adaptation of a c-VEP Brain-Computer Interface(BCI) Based on Error-Related Potentials and Unsupervised Learning

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
158 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
Online Adaptation of a c-VEP Brain-Computer Interface(BCI) Based on Error-Related Potentials and Unsupervised Learning
Published in
PLOS ONE, December 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0051077
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martin Spüler, Wolfgang Rosenstiel, Martin Bogdan

Abstract

The goal of a Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) is to control a computer by pure brain activity. Recently, BCIs based on code-modulated visual evoked potentials (c-VEPs) have shown great potential to establish high-performance communication. In this paper we present a c-VEP BCI that uses online adaptation of the classifier to reduce calibration time and increase performance. We compare two different approaches for online adaptation of the system: an unsupervised method and a method that uses the detection of error-related potentials. Both approaches were tested in an online study, in which an average accuracy of 96% was achieved with adaptation based on error-related potentials. This accuracy corresponds to an average information transfer rate of 144 bit/min, which is the highest bitrate reported so far for a non-invasive BCI. In a free-spelling mode, the subjects were able to write with an average of 21.3 error-free letters per minute, which shows the feasibility of the BCI system in a normal-use scenario. In addition we show that a calibration of the BCI system solely based on the detection of error-related potentials is possible, without knowing the true class labels.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 158 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 3%
Germany 3 2%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 144 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 46 29%
Student > Master 25 16%
Researcher 16 10%
Student > Bachelor 14 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 8%
Other 21 13%
Unknown 23 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 51 32%
Computer Science 36 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 8%
Neuroscience 10 6%
Psychology 8 5%
Other 12 8%
Unknown 28 18%