↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

A Framework of Algorithms: Computing the Bias and Prestige of Nodes in Trust Networks

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
A Framework of Algorithms: Computing the Bias and Prestige of Nodes in Trust Networks
Published in
PLOS ONE, December 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0050843
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rong-Hua Li, Jeffrey Xu Yu, Xin Huang, Hong Cheng

Abstract

A trust network is a social network in which edges represent the trust relationship between two nodes in the network. In a trust network, a fundamental question is how to assess and compute the bias and prestige of the nodes, where the bias of a node measures the trustworthiness of a node and the prestige of a node measures the importance of the node. The larger bias of a node implies the lower trustworthiness of the node, and the larger prestige of a node implies the higher importance of the node. In this paper, we define a vector-valued contractive function to characterize the bias vector which results in a rich family of bias measurements, and we propose a framework of algorithms for computing the bias and prestige of nodes in trust networks. Based on our framework, we develop four algorithms that can calculate the bias and prestige of nodes effectively and robustly. The time and space complexities of all our algorithms are linear with respect to the size of the graph, thus our algorithms are scalable to handle large datasets. We evaluate our algorithms using five real datasets. The experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness, robustness, and scalability of our algorithms.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 5%
Unknown 19 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 30%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 10%
Other 1 5%
Lecturer 1 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 3 15%
Unknown 6 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 5 25%
Mathematics 2 10%
Social Sciences 2 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 5%
Psychology 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 8 40%