↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Anatomical Brain Images Alone Can Accurately Diagnose Chronic Neuropsychiatric Illnesses

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
150 X users
facebook
18 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
5 Google+ users
reddit
5 Redditors
pinterest
1 Pinner

Readers on

mendeley
226 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Anatomical Brain Images Alone Can Accurately Diagnose Chronic Neuropsychiatric Illnesses
Published in
PLOS ONE, December 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0050698
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ravi Bansal, Lawrence H. Staib, Andrew F. Laine, Xuejun Hao, Dongrong Xu, Jun Liu, Myrna Weissman, Bradley S. Peterson

Abstract

Diagnoses using imaging-based measures alone offer the hope of improving the accuracy of clinical diagnosis, thereby reducing the costs associated with incorrect treatments. Previous attempts to use brain imaging for diagnosis, however, have had only limited success in diagnosing patients who are independent of the samples used to derive the diagnostic algorithms. We aimed to develop a classification algorithm that can accurately diagnose chronic, well-characterized neuropsychiatric illness in single individuals, given the availability of sufficiently precise delineations of brain regions across several neural systems in anatomical MR images of the brain.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 150 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 226 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 4%
France 2 <1%
Norway 2 <1%
Sweden 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 205 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 43 19%
Researcher 41 18%
Student > Master 25 11%
Student > Bachelor 21 9%
Other 17 8%
Other 46 20%
Unknown 33 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 64 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 37 16%
Neuroscience 21 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 5%
Engineering 11 5%
Other 34 15%
Unknown 47 21%