↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Learning from Decoys to Improve the Sensitivity and Specificity of Proteomics Database Search Results

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
Learning from Decoys to Improve the Sensitivity and Specificity of Proteomics Database Search Results
Published in
PLOS ONE, November 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0050651
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amit Kumar Yadav, Dhirendra Kumar, Debasis Dash

Abstract

The statistical validation of database search results is a complex issue in bottom-up proteomics. The correct and incorrect peptide spectrum match (PSM) scores overlap significantly, making an accurate assessment of true peptide matches challenging. Since the complete separation between the true and false hits is practically never achieved, there is need for better methods and rescoring algorithms to improve upon the primary database search results. Here we describe the calibration and False Discovery Rate (FDR) estimation of database search scores through a dynamic FDR calculation method, FlexiFDR, which increases both the sensitivity and specificity of search results. Modelling a simple linear regression on the decoy hits for different charge states, the method maximized the number of true positives and reduced the number of false negatives in several standard datasets of varying complexity (18-mix, 49-mix, 200-mix) and few complex datasets (E. coli and Yeast) obtained from a wide variety of MS platforms. The net positive gain for correct spectral and peptide identifications was up to 14.81% and 6.2% respectively. The approach is applicable to different search methodologies--separate as well as concatenated database search, high mass accuracy, and semi-tryptic and modification searches. FlexiFDR was also applied to Mascot results and showed better performance than before. We have shown that appropriate threshold learnt from decoys, can be very effective in improving the database search results. FlexiFDR adapts itself to different instruments, data types and MS platforms. It learns from the decoy hits and sets a flexible threshold that automatically aligns itself to the underlying variables of data quality and size.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 3%
South Africa 1 3%
Unknown 29 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 39%
Researcher 6 19%
Student > Master 3 10%
Other 2 6%
Professor 2 6%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 2 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 32%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 23%
Computer Science 4 13%
Chemistry 2 6%
Chemical Engineering 1 3%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 3 10%