↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Decision Support Methods for Finding Phenotype — Disorder Associations in the Bone Dysplasia Domain

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
Title
Decision Support Methods for Finding Phenotype — Disorder Associations in the Bone Dysplasia Domain
Published in
PLOS ONE, November 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0050614
Pubmed ID
Authors

Razan Paul, Tudor Groza, Jane Hunter, Andreas Zankl

Abstract

A lack of mature domain knowledge and well established guidelines makes the medical diagnosis of skeletal dysplasias (a group of rare genetic disorders) a very complex process. Machine learning techniques can facilitate objective interpretation of medical observations for the purposes of decision support. However, building decision support models using such techniques is highly problematic in the context of rare genetic disorders, because it depends on access to mature domain knowledge. This paper describes an approach for developing a decision support model in medical domains that are underpinned by relatively sparse knowledge bases. We propose a solution that combines association rule mining with the Dempster-Shafer theory (DST) to compute probabilistic associations between sets of clinical features and disorders, which can then serve as support for medical decision making (e.g., diagnosis). We show, via experimental results, that our approach is able to provide meaningful outcomes even on small datasets with sparse distributions, in addition to outperforming other Machine Learning techniques and behaving slightly better than an initial diagnosis by a clinician.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 5%
United States 1 5%
Unknown 19 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 3 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 14%
Student > Master 2 10%
Researcher 2 10%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 6 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 24%
Computer Science 3 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 10%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 7 33%