↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Evaluation of Gene Association Methods for Coexpression Network Construction and Biological Knowledge Discovery

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
181 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
Evaluation of Gene Association Methods for Coexpression Network Construction and Biological Knowledge Discovery
Published in
PLOS ONE, November 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0050411
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sapna Kumari, Jeff Nie, Huann-Sheng Chen, Hao Ma, Ron Stewart, Xiang Li, Meng-Zhu Lu, William M. Taylor, Hairong Wei

Abstract

Constructing coexpression networks and performing network analysis using large-scale gene expression data sets is an effective way to uncover new biological knowledge; however, the methods used for gene association in constructing these coexpression networks have not been thoroughly evaluated. Since different methods lead to structurally different coexpression networks and provide different information, selecting the optimal gene association method is critical.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 181 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
Germany 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Unknown 172 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 62 34%
Researcher 24 13%
Student > Master 22 12%
Student > Postgraduate 14 8%
Student > Bachelor 11 6%
Other 27 15%
Unknown 21 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 66 36%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 43 24%
Computer Science 21 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 3%
Engineering 5 3%
Other 16 9%
Unknown 25 14%