↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

An Evolutionary Model of Bounded Rationality and Intelligence

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
96 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
An Evolutionary Model of Bounded Rationality and Intelligence
Published in
PLOS ONE, November 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0050310
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas J. Brennan, Andrew W. Lo

Abstract

Most economic theories are based on the premise that individuals maximize their own self-interest and correctly incorporate the structure of their environment into all decisions, thanks to human intelligence. The influence of this paradigm goes far beyond academia-it underlies current macroeconomic and monetary policies, and is also an integral part of existing financial regulations. However, there is mounting empirical and experimental evidence, including the recent financial crisis, suggesting that humans do not always behave rationally, but often make seemingly random and suboptimal decisions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 3%
Brazil 2 2%
Turkey 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
China 1 1%
Luxembourg 1 1%
Unknown 86 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 23%
Student > Master 16 17%
Researcher 13 14%
Student > Bachelor 11 11%
Professor 5 5%
Other 17 18%
Unknown 12 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 19 20%
Psychology 12 13%
Business, Management and Accounting 11 11%
Social Sciences 8 8%
Computer Science 5 5%
Other 25 26%
Unknown 16 17%