↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Effectiveness of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Depression in Patients Receiving Disability Benefits: A Systematic Review and Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
7 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
Title
Effectiveness of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Depression in Patients Receiving Disability Benefits: A Systematic Review and Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis
Published in
PLOS ONE, November 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0050202
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shanil Ebrahim, Luis Montoya, Wanda Truong, Sandy Hsu, Mostafa Kamal el Din, Alonso Carrasco-Labra, Jason W. Busse, Stephen D. Walter, Diane Heels-Ansdell, Rachel Couban, Irene Patelis-Siotis, Marg Bellman, L. Esther de Graaf, David J. A. Dozois, Peter J. Bieling, Gordon H. Guyatt

Abstract

To systematically summarize the randomized trial evidence regarding the relative effectiveness of cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) in patients with depression in receipt of disability benefits in comparison to those not receiving disability benefits.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Barbados 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 90 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 11%
Student > Master 10 11%
Student > Bachelor 10 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Other 24 26%
Unknown 17 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 26 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 24 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 3%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 11 12%
Unknown 22 24%