↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

The Effects of a Prophylactic Knee Brace and Two Neoprene Knee Sleeves on the Performance of Healthy Athletes: A Crossover Randomized Controlled Trial

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
116 Mendeley
Title
The Effects of a Prophylactic Knee Brace and Two Neoprene Knee Sleeves on the Performance of Healthy Athletes: A Crossover Randomized Controlled Trial
Published in
PLOS ONE, November 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0050110
Pubmed ID
Authors

Niyousha Mortaza, Ismail Ebrahimi, Ali Ashraf Jamshidi, Vahid Abdollah, Mohammad Kamali, Wan Abu Bakar Wan Abas, Noor Azuan Abu Osman

Abstract

Knee injury is one of the major problems in sports medicine, and the use of prophylactic knee braces is an attempt to reduce the occurrence and/or severity of injuries to the knee joint ligament(s) without inhibiting knee mobility. The aim of the present study was to examine the effect of one recently designed prophylactic knee brace and two neoprene knee sleeves upon performance of healthy athletes. Thirty-one healthy male athletes (age = 21.2 ± 1.5) volunteered as participants to examine the effect of prophylactic knee brace/sleeves on performance using isokinetic and functional tests. All subjects were tested in four conditions in a random order: 1. nonbraced (control) 2. using a neoprene knee sleeve 3. using a knee sleeve with four bilateral metal supports and 4. using a prophylactic knee brace. The study design was a crossover, randomized, controlled trial. Subjects completed single leg vertical jump, cross-over hop, and the isokinetic knee flexion and extension (at 60, 180, 300°/sec). Data were collected from the above tests and analyzed for jump height, cross-over hop distance, peak torque to body weight ratio and average power, respectively. Comparisons of these variables in the four testing conditions revealed no statistically significant difference (p>0.05). The selected prophylactic brace/sleeves did not significantly inhibit athletic performance which might verify that their structure and design have caused no complication in the normal function of the knee joint. Moreover, it could be speculated that, if the brace or the sleeves had any limiting effect, our young healthy athletic subjects were well able to generate a mean peak torque large enough to overcome this possible restriction. Further studies are suggested to investigate the long term effect of these prophylactic knee brace and sleeves as well as their possible effect on the adjacent joints to the knee.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Sri Lanka 1 <1%
Unknown 112 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 21 18%
Student > Master 18 16%
Researcher 11 9%
Student > Postgraduate 10 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 8%
Other 22 19%
Unknown 25 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 26%
Engineering 16 14%
Sports and Recreations 13 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 10%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Other 8 7%
Unknown 33 28%