↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

The Moral Stereotypes of Liberals and Conservatives: Exaggeration of Differences across the Political Spectrum

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
29 news outlets
blogs
6 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
266 X users
facebook
12 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
6 Google+ users
reddit
4 Redditors

Citations

dimensions_citation
204 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
379 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
The Moral Stereotypes of Liberals and Conservatives: Exaggeration of Differences across the Political Spectrum
Published in
PLOS ONE, December 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0050092
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jesse Graham, Brian A. Nosek, Jonathan Haidt

Abstract

We investigated the moral stereotypes political liberals and conservatives have of themselves and each other. In reality, liberals endorse the individual-focused moral concerns of compassion and fairness more than conservatives do, and conservatives endorse the group-focused moral concerns of ingroup loyalty, respect for authorities and traditions, and physical/spiritual purity more than liberals do. 2,212 U.S. participants filled out the Moral Foundations Questionnaire with their own answers, or as a typical liberal or conservative would answer. Across the political spectrum, moral stereotypes about "typical" liberals and conservatives correctly reflected the direction of actual differences in foundation endorsement but exaggerated the magnitude of these differences. Contrary to common theories of stereotyping, the moral stereotypes were not simple underestimations of the political outgroup's morality. Both liberals and conservatives exaggerated the ideological extremity of moral concerns for the ingroup as well as the outgroup. Liberals were least accurate about both groups.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 266 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 379 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 2%
Spain 2 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Luxembourg 1 <1%
Unknown 365 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 91 24%
Student > Master 58 15%
Student > Bachelor 45 12%
Researcher 28 7%
Professor 22 6%
Other 75 20%
Unknown 60 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 145 38%
Social Sciences 71 19%
Philosophy 15 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 13 3%
Arts and Humanities 11 3%
Other 54 14%
Unknown 70 18%