↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

On the Contribution of Binocular Disparity to the Long-Term Memory for Natural Scenes

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
Title
On the Contribution of Binocular Disparity to the Long-Term Memory for Natural Scenes
Published in
PLOS ONE, November 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0049947
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matteo Valsecchi, Karl R. Gegenfurtner

Abstract

Binocular disparity is a fundamental dimension defining the input we receive from the visual world, along with luminance and chromaticity. In a memory task involving images of natural scenes we investigate whether binocular disparity enhances long-term visual memory. We found that forest images studied in the presence of disparity for relatively long times (7s) were remembered better as compared to 2D presentation. This enhancement was not evident for other categories of pictures, such as images containing cars and houses, which are mostly identified by the presence of distinctive artifacts rather than by their spatial layout. Evidence from a further experiment indicates that observers do not retain a trace of stereo presentation in long-term memory.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 4%
Unknown 24 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 36%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 24%
Student > Master 2 8%
Lecturer 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 3 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 8 32%
Neuroscience 5 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Computer Science 1 4%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 6 24%