↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Systematic Review of TST Responses in People Living with HIV in Under-Resourced Settings: Implications for Isoniazid Preventive Therapy

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
148 Mendeley
Title
Systematic Review of TST Responses in People Living with HIV in Under-Resourced Settings: Implications for Isoniazid Preventive Therapy
Published in
PLOS ONE, November 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0049928
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrew D. Kerkhoff, Katharina Kranzer, Taraz Samandari, Jessica Nakiyingi-Miiro, Christopher C. Whalen, Anthony D. Harries, Stephen D. Lawn

Abstract

People living with HIV (PLWH) who have positive tuberculin skin tests (TST) benefit from isoniazid preventive therapy (IPT) whereas those testing TST-negative do not. Revised World Health Organization guidelines explicitly state that assessment of TST is not a requirement for initiation of IPT. However, it is not known what proportions of patients will benefit from IPT if implemented without targeting according to TST status. We therefore determined the proportions of PLWH who test TST-positive.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 148 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 3 2%
Netherlands 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 143 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 31 21%
Student > Master 22 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 13%
Student > Postgraduate 12 8%
Student > Bachelor 10 7%
Other 34 23%
Unknown 20 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 58 39%
Social Sciences 11 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 5%
Other 23 16%
Unknown 33 22%