↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Natural or Artificial? Habitat-Use by the Bull Shark, Carcharhinus leucas

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
11 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
136 Mendeley
Title
Natural or Artificial? Habitat-Use by the Bull Shark, Carcharhinus leucas
Published in
PLOS ONE, November 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0049796
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jonathan M. Werry, Shing Y. Lee, Charles J. Lemckert, Nicholas M. Otway

Abstract

Despite accelerated global population declines due to targeted and illegal fishing pressure for many top-level shark species, the impacts of coastal habitat modification have been largely overlooked. We present the first direct comparison of the use of natural versus artificial habitats for the bull shark, Carcharhinus leucas, an IUCN 'Near-threatened' species--one of the few truly euryhaline sharks that utilises natural rivers and estuaries as nursery grounds before migrating offshore as adults. Understanding the value of alternate artificial coastal habitats to the lifecycle of the bull shark is crucial for determining the impact of coastal development on this threatened but potentially dangerous species.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Bahamas 1 <1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 132 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 33 24%
Researcher 24 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 15%
Student > Bachelor 18 13%
Other 6 4%
Other 16 12%
Unknown 18 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 71 52%
Environmental Science 28 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 1%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 1%
Other 8 6%
Unknown 21 15%