↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

OTU Analysis Using Metagenomic Shotgun Sequencing Data

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
159 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
OTU Analysis Using Metagenomic Shotgun Sequencing Data
Published in
PLOS ONE, November 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0049785
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xiaolin Hao, Ting Chen

Abstract

Because of technological limitations, the primer and amplification biases in targeted sequencing of 16S rRNA genes have veiled the true microbial diversity underlying environmental samples. However, the protocol of metagenomic shotgun sequencing provides 16S rRNA gene fragment data with natural immunity against the biases raised during priming and thus the potential of uncovering the true structure of microbial community by giving more accurate predictions of operational taxonomic units (OTUs). Nonetheless, the lack of statistically rigorous comparison between 16S rRNA gene fragments and other data types makes it difficult to interpret previously reported results using 16S rRNA gene fragments. Therefore, in the present work, we established a standard analysis pipeline that would help confirm if the differences in the data are true or are just due to potential technical bias. This pipeline is built by using simulated data to find optimal mapping and OTU prediction methods. The comparison between simulated datasets revealed a relationship between 16S rRNA gene fragments and full-length 16S rRNA sequences that a 16S rRNA gene fragment having a length >150 bp provides the same accuracy as a full-length 16S rRNA sequence using our proposed pipeline, which could serve as a good starting point for experimental design and making the comparison between 16S rRNA gene fragment-based and targeted 16S rRNA sequencing-based surveys possible.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 159 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 10 6%
France 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 141 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 23%
Researcher 35 22%
Student > Master 24 15%
Student > Bachelor 18 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 8%
Other 23 14%
Unknown 9 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 90 57%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 25 16%
Environmental Science 9 6%
Computer Science 7 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 2%
Other 11 7%
Unknown 14 9%