↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Return to Work Coordination Programmes for Work Disability: A Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
5 policy sources
twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
77 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
137 Mendeley
Title
Return to Work Coordination Programmes for Work Disability: A Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials
Published in
PLOS ONE, November 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0049760
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stefan Schandelmaier, Shanil Ebrahim, Susan C. A. Burkhardt, Wout E. L. de Boer, Thomas Zumbrunn, Gordon H. Guyatt, Jason W. Busse, Regina Kunz

Abstract

The dramatic rise in chronically ill patients on permanent disability benefits threatens the sustainability of social security in high-income countries. Social insurance organizations have started to invest in promising, but costly return to work (RTW) coordination programmes. The benefit, however, remains uncertain. We conducted a systematic review to determine the long-term effectiveness of RTW coordination compared to usual practice in patients at risk for long-term disability.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 4 3%
Denmark 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 130 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 18%
Researcher 23 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 7%
Other 34 25%
Unknown 23 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 19%
Psychology 18 13%
Social Sciences 16 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 9%
Computer Science 8 6%
Other 29 21%
Unknown 27 20%