↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Ferocious Fighting between Male Grasshoppers

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
19 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
Title
Ferocious Fighting between Male Grasshoppers
Published in
PLOS ONE, November 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0049600
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kate D. L. Umbers, Nikolai J. Tatarnic, Gregory I. Holwell, Marie E. Herberstein

Abstract

Contests among individuals over mating opportunities are common across diverse taxa, yet physical conflict is relatively rare. Due to the potentially fatal consequences of physical fighting, most animals employ mechanisms of conflict resolution involving signalling and ritualistic assessment. Here we provide the first evidence of ubiquitous escalated fighting in grasshoppers. The chameleon grasshopper (Kosciuscola tristis) is an Australian alpine specialist, in which males engage in highly aggressive combat over ovipositing females. We describe discrete agonistic behaviours including mandible flaring, mounting, grappling, kicking and biting, and their use depending on the individual's role as challenger or defender. We show that male role predicts damage, with challengers being more heavily damaged than males defending females (defenders). Challengers also possess wider mandibles than defenders, but are similar in other metrics of body size. Our data suggest that fights escalate between males matched in body size and that mandibles are used as weapons in this species. This system represents an exciting opportunity for future research into the evolution of costly fighting behaviour in an otherwise placid group.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 3%
Unknown 28 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 24%
Student > Bachelor 5 17%
Researcher 4 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 10%
Student > Master 3 10%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 4 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 52%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 7%
Psychology 2 7%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 3 10%