↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Saccadic Compression of Symbolic Numerical Magnitude

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
Title
Saccadic Compression of Symbolic Numerical Magnitude
Published in
PLOS ONE, November 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0049587
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paola Binda, M. Concetta Morrone, Frank Bremmer

Abstract

Stimuli flashed briefly around the time of saccadic eye movements are subject to complex distortions: compression of space and time; underestimate of numerosity. Here we show that saccadic distortions extend to abstract quantities, affecting the representation of symbolic numerical magnitude. Subjects consistently underestimated the results of rapidly computed mental additions and subtractions, when the operands were briefly displayed before a saccade. However, the recognition of the number symbols was unimpaired. These results are consistent with the hypothesis of a common, abstract metric encoding magnitude along multiple dimensions. They suggest that a surprising link exists between the preparation of action and the representation of abstract quantities.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 5%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Luxembourg 1 2%
Unknown 40 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 20%
Student > Master 6 14%
Researcher 5 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Professor 3 7%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 10 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 22 50%
Neuroscience 3 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Computer Science 2 5%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 11 25%