↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Phylogenetic Patterns of Geographical and Ecological Diversification in the Subgenus Drosophila

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
Title
Phylogenetic Patterns of Geographical and Ecological Diversification in the Subgenus Drosophila
Published in
PLOS ONE, November 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0049552
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ramiro Morales-Hojas, Jorge Vieira

Abstract

Colonisation of new geographic regions and/or of new ecological resources can result in rapid species diversification into the new ecological niches available. Members of the subgenus Drosophila are distributed across the globe and show a large diversity of ecological niches. Furthermore, taxonomic classification of Drosophila includes the rank radiation, which refers to closely related species groups. Nevertheless, it has never been tested if these taxonomic radiations correspond to evolutionary radiations. Here we present a study of the patterns of diversification of Drosophila to test for increased diversification rates in relation to the geographic and ecological diversification processes. For this, we have estimated and dated a phylogeny of 218 species belonging to the major species groups of the subgenus. The obtained phylogenies are largely consistent with previous studies and indicate that the major groups appeared during the Oligocene/Miocene transition or early Miocene, characterized by a trend of climate warming with brief periods of glaciation. Ancestral reconstruction of geographic ranges and ecological resource use suggest at least two dispersals to the Neotropics from the ancestral Asiatic tropical disribution, and several transitions to specialized ecological resource use (mycophagous and cactophilic). Colonisation of new geographic regions and/or of new ecological resources can result in rapid species diversification into the new ecological niches available. However, diversification analyses show no significant support for adaptive radiations as a result of geographic dispersal or ecological resource shift. Also, cactophily has not resulted in an increase in the diversification rate of the repleta and related groups. It is thus concluded that the taxonomic radiations do not correspond to adaptive radiations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 8%
Brazil 3 3%
Switzerland 1 1%
Portugal 1 1%
Colombia 1 1%
Chile 1 1%
Unknown 83 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 19%
Student > Master 13 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 12%
Student > Bachelor 8 8%
Other 14 14%
Unknown 11 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 68 69%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 10%
Environmental Science 4 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 2%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 11 11%