↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Probability of Seeing Increases Saccadic Readiness

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Probability of Seeing Increases Saccadic Readiness
Published in
PLOS ONE, November 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0049454
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thérèse Collins

Abstract

Associating movement directions or endpoints with monetary rewards or costs influences movement parameters in humans, and associating movement directions or endpoints with food reward influences movement parameters in non-human primates. Rewarded movements are facilitated relative to non-rewarded movements. The present study examined to what extent successful foveation facilitated saccadic eye movement behavior, with the hypothesis that foveation may constitute an informational reward. Human adults performed saccades to peripheral targets that either remained visible after saccade completion or were extinguished, preventing visual feedback. Saccades to targets that were systematically extinguished were slower and easier to inhibit than saccades to targets that afforded successful foveation, and this effect was modulated by the probability of successful foveation. These results suggest that successful foveation facilitates behavior, and that obtaining the expected sensory consequences of a saccadic eye movement may serve as a reward for the oculomotor system.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 52%
Researcher 2 10%
Student > Master 2 10%
Student > Postgraduate 2 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 2 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 6 29%
Neuroscience 4 19%
Computer Science 2 10%
Engineering 2 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Other 4 19%
Unknown 2 10%