↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Case-Only Designs in Pharmacoepidemiology: A Systematic Review

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
Title
Case-Only Designs in Pharmacoepidemiology: A Systematic Review
Published in
PLOS ONE, November 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0049444
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sandra Nordmann, Lucie Biard, Philippe Ravaud, Marina Esposito-Farèse, Florence Tubach

Abstract

Case-only designs have been used since late 1980's. In these, as opposed to case-control or cohort studies for instance, only cases are required and are self-controlled, eliminating selection biases and confounding related to control subjects, and time-invariant characteristics. The objectives of this systematic review were to analyze how the two main case-only designs - case-crossover (CC) and self-controlled case series (SCCS) - have been applied and reported in pharmacoepidemiology literature, in terms of applicability assumptions and specificities of these designs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
France 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 73 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 18%
Researcher 14 18%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 10%
Student > Master 8 10%
Professor 6 8%
Other 13 17%
Unknown 14 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 47%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 9%
Mathematics 4 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Computer Science 2 3%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 21 27%