↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Word Generalization by a Dog (Canis familiaris): Is Shape Important?

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
37 X users
facebook
18 Facebook pages
reddit
2 Redditors
video
2 YouTube creators

Readers on

mendeley
121 Mendeley
Title
Word Generalization by a Dog (Canis familiaris): Is Shape Important?
Published in
PLOS ONE, November 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0049382
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emile van der Zee, Helen Zulch, Daniel Mills

Abstract

We investigated the presence of a key feature of human word comprehension in a five year old Border Collie: the generalization of a word referring to an object to other objects of the same shape, also known as shape bias. Our first experiment confirmed a solid history of word learning in the dog, thus making it possible for certain object features to have become central in his word comprehension. Using an experimental paradigm originally employed to establish shape bias in children and human adults we taught the dog arbitrary object names (e.g. dax) for novel objects. Two experiments showed that when briefly familiarized with word-object mappings the dog did not generalize object names to object shape but to object size. A fourth experiment showed that when familiarized with a word-object mapping for a longer period of time the dog tended to generalize the word to objects with the same texture. These results show that the dog tested did not display human-like word comprehension, but word generalization and word reference development of a qualitatively different nature compared to humans. We conclude that a shape bias for word generalization in humans is due to the distinct evolutionary history of the human sensory system for object identification and that more research is necessary to confirm qualitative differences in word generalization between humans and dogs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 3 2%
Hungary 2 2%
United States 2 2%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Luxembourg 1 <1%
Unknown 109 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 21%
Student > Bachelor 14 12%
Other 13 11%
Student > Master 7 6%
Other 24 20%
Unknown 12 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 26%
Psychology 25 21%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 9 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 7%
Linguistics 3 2%
Other 19 16%
Unknown 24 20%