↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Spatio-Temporal Variation in Predation by Urban Domestic Cats (Felis catus) and the Acceptability of Possible Management Actions in the UK

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
16 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
93 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
69 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
236 Mendeley
Title
Spatio-Temporal Variation in Predation by Urban Domestic Cats (Felis catus) and the Acceptability of Possible Management Actions in the UK
Published in
PLOS ONE, November 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0049369
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rebecca L. Thomas, Mark D. E. Fellowes, Philip J. Baker

Abstract

Urban domestic cat (Felis catus) populations can attain exceedingly high densities and are not limited by natural prey availability. This has generated concerns that they may negatively affect prey populations, leading to calls for management. We enlisted cat-owners to record prey returned home to estimate patterns of predation by free-roaming pets in different localities within the town of Reading, UK and questionnaire surveys were used to quantify attitudes to different possible management strategies. Prey return rates were highly variable: only 20% of cats returned ≥4 dead prey annually. Consequently, approximately 65% of owners received no prey in a given season, but this declined to 22% after eight seasons. The estimated mean predation rate was 18.3 prey cat⁻¹ year⁻¹ but this varied markedly both spatially and temporally: per capita predation rates declined with increasing cat density. Comparisons with estimates of the density of six common bird prey species indicated that cats killed numbers equivalent to adult density on c. 39% of occasions. Population modeling studies suggest that such predation rates could significantly reduce the size of local bird populations for common urban species. Conversely, most urban residents did not consider cat predation to be a significant problem. Collar-mounted anti-predation devices were the only management action acceptable to the majority of urban residents (65%), but were less acceptable to cat-owners because of perceived risks to their pets; only 24% of cats were fitted with such devices. Overall, cat predation did appear to be of sufficient magnitude to affect some prey populations, although further investigation of some key aspects of cat predation is warranted. Management of the predation behavior of urban cat populations in the UK is likely to be challenging and achieving this would require considerable engagement with cat owners.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 93 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 236 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
Unknown 225 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 66 28%
Researcher 31 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 11%
Student > Master 27 11%
Other 15 6%
Other 30 13%
Unknown 40 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 112 47%
Environmental Science 34 14%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 13 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 2%
Social Sciences 5 2%
Other 17 7%
Unknown 50 21%