↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Should Sputum Smear Examination Be Carried Out at the End of the Intensive Phase and End of Treatment in Sputum Smear Negative Pulmonary TB Patients?

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
Title
Should Sputum Smear Examination Be Carried Out at the End of the Intensive Phase and End of Treatment in Sputum Smear Negative Pulmonary TB Patients?
Published in
PLOS ONE, November 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0049238
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sumit Malhotra, Sanjay P. Zodpey, Shivani Chandra, Ram Pal Vashist, Srinath Satyanaryana, Rony Zachariah, Anthony D. Harries

Abstract

The Indian guidelines on following up sputum smear-negative Pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) patients differ from the current World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines in that the former recommends two follow up sputum examinations (once at the end of intensive phase and the other at the end of treatment) while the latter recommends only one follow up sputum smear microscopy examination, which is done at the end of the intensive phase. This study was conducted to examine if there was any added value in performing an additional sputum smear examination at the end of treatment within the context of a national TB program.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 78 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 14 18%
Student > Master 13 16%
Researcher 11 14%
Other 9 11%
Lecturer 4 5%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 19 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 42%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 22 28%