↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

How Are Academic Age, Productivity and Collaboration Related to Citing Behavior of Researchers?

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
21 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
70 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
126 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
How Are Academic Age, Productivity and Collaboration Related to Citing Behavior of Researchers?
Published in
PLOS ONE, November 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0049176
Pubmed ID
Authors

Staša Milojević

Abstract

References are an essential component of research articles and therefore of scientific communication. In this study we investigate referencing (citing) behavior in five diverse fields (astronomy, mathematics, robotics, ecology and economics) based on 213,756 core journal articles. At the macro level we find: (a) a steady increase in the number of references per article over the period studied (50 years), which in some fields is due to a higher rate of usage, while in others reflects longer articles and (b) an increase in all fields in the fraction of older, foundational references since the 1980s, with no obvious change in citing patterns associated with the introduction of the Internet. At the meso level we explore current (2006-2010) referencing behavior of different categories of authors (21,562 total) within each field, based on their academic age, productivity and collaborative practices. Contrary to some previous findings and expectations we find that senior researchers use references at the same rate as their junior colleagues, with similar rates of re-citation (use of same references in multiple papers). High Modified Price Index (MPI, which measures the speed of the research front more accurately than the traditional Price Index) of senior authors indicates that their research has the similar cutting-edge aspect as that of their younger colleagues. In all fields both the productive researchers and especially those who collaborate more use a significantly lower fraction of foundational references and have much higher MPI and lower re-citation rates, i.e., they are the ones pushing the research front regardless of researcher age. This paper introduces improved bibliometric methods to measure the speed of the research front, disambiguate lead authors in co-authored papers and decouple measures of productivity and collaboration.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 5%
United Kingdom 2 2%
Russia 2 2%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 110 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 11 9%
Student > Master 11 9%
Professor 11 9%
Other 37 29%
Unknown 21 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 28 22%
Computer Science 13 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 7 6%
Other 30 24%
Unknown 27 21%