↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Effects of Slow Deep Breathing at High Altitude on Oxygen Saturation, Pulmonary and Systemic Hemodynamics

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
17 news outlets
twitter
8 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user
q&a
1 Q&A thread
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
161 Mendeley
Title
Effects of Slow Deep Breathing at High Altitude on Oxygen Saturation, Pulmonary and Systemic Hemodynamics
Published in
PLOS ONE, November 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0049074
Pubmed ID
Authors

Grzegorz Bilo, Miriam Revera, Maurizio Bussotti, Daniele Bonacina, Katarzyna Styczkiewicz, Gianluca Caldara, Alessia Giglio, Andrea Faini, Andrea Giuliano, Carolina Lombardi, Kalina Kawecka-Jaszcz, Giuseppe Mancia, Piergiuseppe Agostoni, Gianfranco Parati

Abstract

Slow deep breathing improves blood oxygenation (Sp(O2)) and affects hemodynamics in hypoxic patients. We investigated the ventilatory and hemodynamic effects of slow deep breathing in normal subjects at high altitude. We collected data in healthy lowlanders staying either at 4559 m for 2-3 days (Study A; N = 39) or at 5400 m for 12-16 days (Study B; N = 28). Study variables, including Sp(O2) and systemic and pulmonary arterial pressure, were assessed before, during and after 15 minutes of breathing at 6 breaths/min. At the end of slow breathing, an increase in Sp(O2) (Study A: from 80.2±7.7% to 89.5±8.2%; Study B: from 81.0±4.2% to 88.6±4.5; both p<0.001) and significant reductions in systemic and pulmonary arterial pressure occurred. This was associated with increased tidal volume and no changes in minute ventilation or pulmonary CO diffusion. Slow deep breathing improves ventilation efficiency for oxygen as shown by blood oxygenation increase, and it reduces systemic and pulmonary blood pressure at high altitude but does not change pulmonary gas diffusion.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 161 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 158 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 29 18%
Student > Master 20 12%
Student > Postgraduate 8 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 5%
Other 7 4%
Other 27 17%
Unknown 62 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 15%
Psychology 8 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 4%
Engineering 6 4%
Other 20 12%
Unknown 65 40%