↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

A Phylogenomic Approach to Vertebrate Phylogeny Supports a Turtle-Archosaur Affinity and a Possible Paraphyletic Lissamphibia

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
15 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
183 Mendeley
Title
A Phylogenomic Approach to Vertebrate Phylogeny Supports a Turtle-Archosaur Affinity and a Possible Paraphyletic Lissamphibia
Published in
PLOS ONE, November 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0048990
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jonathan J. Fong, Jeremy M. Brown, Matthew K. Fujita, Bastien Boussau

Abstract

In resolving the vertebrate tree of life, two fundamental questions remain: 1) what is the phylogenetic position of turtles within amniotes, and 2) what are the relationships between the three major lissamphibian (extant amphibian) groups? These relationships have historically been difficult to resolve, with five different hypotheses proposed for turtle placement, and four proposed branching patterns within Lissamphibia. We compiled a large cDNA/EST dataset for vertebrates (75 genes for 129 taxa) to address these outstanding questions. Gene-specific phylogenetic analyses revealed a great deal of variation in preferred topology, resulting in topologically ambiguous conclusions from the combined dataset. Due to consistent preferences for the same divergent topologies across genes, we suspected systematic phylogenetic error as a cause of some variation. Accordingly, we developed and tested a novel statistical method that identifies sites that have a high probability of containing biased signal for a specific phylogenetic relationship. After removing putatively biased sites, support emerged for a sister relationship between turtles and either crocodilians or archosaurs, as well as for a caecilian-salamander sister relationship within Lissamphibia, with Lissamphibia potentially paraphyletic.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 183 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Brazil 3 2%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Réunion 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Philippines 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 168 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 33 18%
Student > Master 31 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 15%
Student > Bachelor 26 14%
Professor 13 7%
Other 34 19%
Unknown 18 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 108 59%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 20 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 9%
Environmental Science 6 3%
Computer Science 3 2%
Other 9 5%
Unknown 20 11%