Title |
A Phylogenomic Approach to Vertebrate Phylogeny Supports a Turtle-Archosaur Affinity and a Possible Paraphyletic Lissamphibia
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, November 2012
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0048990 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jonathan J. Fong, Jeremy M. Brown, Matthew K. Fujita, Bastien Boussau |
Abstract |
In resolving the vertebrate tree of life, two fundamental questions remain: 1) what is the phylogenetic position of turtles within amniotes, and 2) what are the relationships between the three major lissamphibian (extant amphibian) groups? These relationships have historically been difficult to resolve, with five different hypotheses proposed for turtle placement, and four proposed branching patterns within Lissamphibia. We compiled a large cDNA/EST dataset for vertebrates (75 genes for 129 taxa) to address these outstanding questions. Gene-specific phylogenetic analyses revealed a great deal of variation in preferred topology, resulting in topologically ambiguous conclusions from the combined dataset. Due to consistent preferences for the same divergent topologies across genes, we suspected systematic phylogenetic error as a cause of some variation. Accordingly, we developed and tested a novel statistical method that identifies sites that have a high probability of containing biased signal for a specific phylogenetic relationship. After removing putatively biased sites, support emerged for a sister relationship between turtles and either crocodilians or archosaurs, as well as for a caecilian-salamander sister relationship within Lissamphibia, with Lissamphibia potentially paraphyletic. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 4 | 27% |
United Kingdom | 3 | 20% |
Germany | 1 | 7% |
Spain | 1 | 7% |
Brazil | 1 | 7% |
Argentina | 1 | 7% |
Indonesia | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 3 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 8 | 53% |
Scientists | 7 | 47% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 2% |
Brazil | 3 | 2% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
Réunion | 1 | <1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
Japan | 1 | <1% |
Chile | 1 | <1% |
Philippines | 1 | <1% |
Other | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 168 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 33 | 18% |
Student > Master | 31 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 26 | 14% |
Professor | 13 | 7% |
Other | 34 | 19% |
Unknown | 18 | 10% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 108 | 59% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 20 | 11% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 17 | 9% |
Environmental Science | 6 | 3% |
Computer Science | 3 | 2% |
Other | 9 | 5% |
Unknown | 20 | 11% |