↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Implicit Learning of Arithmetic Regularities Is Facilitated by Proximal Contrast

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
Title
Implicit Learning of Arithmetic Regularities Is Facilitated by Proximal Contrast
Published in
PLOS ONE, October 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0048868
Pubmed ID
Authors

Richard W. Prather

Abstract

Natural number arithmetic is a simple, powerful and important symbolic system. Despite intense focus on learning in cognitive development and educational research many adults have weak knowledge of the system. In current study participants learn arithmetic principles via an implicit learning paradigm. Participants learn not by solving arithmetic equations, but through viewing and evaluating example equations, similar to the implicit learning of artificial grammars. We expand this to the symbolic arithmetic system. Specifically we find that exposure to principle-inconsistent examples facilitates the acquisition of arithmetic principle knowledge if the equations are presented to the learning in a temporally proximate fashion. The results expand on research of the implicit learning of regularities and suggest that contrasting cases, show to facilitate explicit arithmetic learning, is also relevant to implicit learning of arithmetic.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 19%
Researcher 4 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Professor 3 10%
Other 7 23%
Unknown 4 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 11 35%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 10%
Engineering 2 6%
Neuroscience 2 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 5 16%
Unknown 7 23%