↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

A Bayesian Interpretation of the Particle Swarm Optimization and Its Kernel Extension

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
Title
A Bayesian Interpretation of the Particle Swarm Optimization and Its Kernel Extension
Published in
PLOS ONE, November 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0048710
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter Andras

Abstract

Particle swarm optimization is a popular method for solving difficult optimization problems. There have been attempts to formulate the method in formal probabilistic or stochastic terms (e.g. bare bones particle swarm) with the aim to achieve more generality and explain the practical behavior of the method. Here we present a Bayesian interpretation of the particle swarm optimization. This interpretation provides a formal framework for incorporation of prior knowledge about the problem that is being solved. Furthermore, it also allows to extend the particle optimization method through the use of kernel functions that represent the intermediary transformation of the data into a different space where the optimization problem is expected to be easier to be resolved-such transformation can be seen as a form of prior knowledge about the nature of the optimization problem. We derive from the general Bayesian formulation the commonly used particle swarm methods as particular cases.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Netherlands 1 2%
Unknown 40 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 31%
Researcher 5 12%
Student > Master 4 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Other 8 19%
Unknown 6 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 18 43%
Engineering 6 14%
Mathematics 5 12%
Physics and Astronomy 4 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 6 14%