↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Racial Bias in Perceptions of Others’ Pain

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
25 news outlets
blogs
8 blogs
twitter
228 X users
facebook
25 Facebook pages
googleplus
5 Google+ users
reddit
1 Redditor
video
6 YouTube creators

Readers on

mendeley
255 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Racial Bias in Perceptions of Others’ Pain
Published in
PLOS ONE, November 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0048546
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sophie Trawalter, Kelly M. Hoffman, Adam Waytz

Abstract

The present work provides evidence that people assume a priori that Blacks feel less pain than do Whites. It also demonstrates that this bias is rooted in perceptions of status and the privilege (or hardship) status confers, not race per se. Archival data from the National Football League injury reports reveal that, relative to injured White players, injured Black players are deemed more likely to play in a subsequent game, possibly because people assume they feel less pain. Experiments 1-4 show that White and Black Americans-including registered nurses and nursing students-assume that Black people feel less pain than do White people. Finally, Experiments 5 and 6 provide evidence that this bias is rooted in perceptions of status, not race per se. Taken together, these data have important implications for understanding race-related biases and healthcare disparities.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 228 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 255 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
Ireland 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Luxembourg 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 243 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 50 20%
Student > Master 39 15%
Student > Bachelor 28 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 27 11%
Researcher 19 7%
Other 39 15%
Unknown 53 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 79 31%
Social Sciences 25 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 25 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 4%
Other 44 17%
Unknown 62 24%