↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Oscillatory Threshold Logic

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs
twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
Title
Oscillatory Threshold Logic
Published in
PLOS ONE, November 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0048498
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jon Borresen, Stephen Lynch

Abstract

In the 1940s, the first generation of modern computers used vacuum tube oscillators as their principle components, however, with the development of the transistor, such oscillator based computers quickly became obsolete. As the demand for faster and lower power computers continues, transistors are themselves approaching their theoretical limit and emerging technologies must eventually supersede them. With the development of optical oscillators and Josephson junction technology, we are again presented with the possibility of using oscillators as the basic components of computers, and it is possible that the next generation of computers will be composed almost entirely of oscillatory devices. Here, we demonstrate how coupled threshold oscillators may be used to perform binary logic in a manner entirely consistent with modern computer architectures. We describe a variety of computational circuitry and demonstrate working oscillator models of both computation and memory.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Luxembourg 1 3%
Unknown 31 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 34%
Researcher 4 13%
Student > Master 3 9%
Professor 3 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 7 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 9 28%
Computer Science 4 13%
Psychology 2 6%
Physics and Astronomy 2 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 6%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 10 31%