↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Rare Variant Analysis for Family-Based Design

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
83 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Rare Variant Analysis for Family-Based Design
Published in
PLOS ONE, January 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0048495
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gourab De, Wai-Ki Yip, Iuliana Ionita-Laza, Nan Laird

Abstract

Genome-wide association studies have been able to identify disease associations with many common variants; however most of the estimated genetic contribution explained by these variants appears to be very modest. Rare variants are thought to have larger effect sizes compared to common SNPs but effects of rare variants cannot be tested in the GWAS setting. Here we propose a novel method to test for association of rare variants obtained by sequencing in family-based samples by collapsing the standard family-based association test (FBAT) statistic over a region of interest. We also propose a suitable weighting scheme so that low frequency SNPs that may be enriched in functional variants can be upweighted compared to common variants. Using simulations we show that the family-based methods perform at par with the population-based methods under no population stratification. By construction, family-based tests are completely robust to population stratification; we show that our proposed methods remain valid even when population stratification is present.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
Spain 2 3%
Sweden 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
Unknown 71 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 23%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 8%
Student > Master 6 8%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 10 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 34 44%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 9%
Mathematics 3 4%
Computer Science 3 4%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 10 13%