↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Efficacy of Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy in the Treatment of PTSD: A Systematic Review

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
9 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
7 X users
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages
reddit
1 Redditor
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
556 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Efficacy of Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy in the Treatment of PTSD: A Systematic Review
Published in
PLOS ONE, December 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0048469
Pubmed ID
Authors

Raquel Gonçalves, Ana Lúcia Pedrozo, Evandro Silva Freire Coutinho, Ivan Figueira, Paula Ventura

Abstract

The use of Information and Communication Technologies, such as virtual reality, has been employed in the treatment of anxiety disorders with the goal of augmenting exposure treatment, which is already considered to be the first-line treatment for Post-traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). To evaluate the efficacy of virtual reality exposure therapy (VRET) in the treatment of PTSD, we performed a systematic review of published articles using the following electronic databases: Web of Science, PubMed, PsycINFO, and PILOTS. Eligibility criteria included the use of patients diagnosed with PTSD according to DSM-IV, the use of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and the use of virtual reality for performing exposure. 10 articles were selected, seven of which showed that VRET produced statistically significant results in comparison to the waiting list. However, no difference was found between VRET and exposure treatment. Of these 10, four were randomized, two were controlled but not randomized and four were non-controlled. The majority of the articles used head-mounted display virtual reality (VR) equipment and VR systems specific for the population that was being treated. Dropout rates do not seem to be lower than in traditional exposure treatment. However, there are a few limitations. Because this is a new field of research, there are few studies in the literature. There is also a need to standardize the number of sessions used. The randomized studies were analyzed to assess the quality of the methodology, and important deficiencies were noted, such as the non-use of intent-to- treat-analysis and the absence of description of possible concomitant treatments and comorbidities. Preliminary data suggest that VRET is as efficacious as traditional exposure treatment and can be especially useful in the treatment of patients who are resistant to traditional exposure.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 556 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Finland 2 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 545 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 119 21%
Student > Master 84 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 67 12%
Researcher 44 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 35 6%
Other 95 17%
Unknown 112 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 178 32%
Medicine and Dentistry 50 9%
Computer Science 47 8%
Social Sciences 26 5%
Neuroscience 25 4%
Other 100 18%
Unknown 130 23%