↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Bats in a Farming Landscape Benefit from Linear Remnants and Unimproved Pastures

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
13 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
218 Mendeley
Title
Bats in a Farming Landscape Benefit from Linear Remnants and Unimproved Pastures
Published in
PLOS ONE, November 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0048201
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pia E. Lentini, Philip Gibbons, Joern Fischer, Brad Law, Jan Hanspach, Tara G. Martin

Abstract

Schemes designed to make farming landscapes less hostile to wildlife have been questioned because target taxa do not always respond in the expected manner. Microbats are often overlooked in this process, yet persist in agricultural landscapes and exert top-down control of crop pests. We investigated the relationship between microbats and measures commonly incorporated into agri-environment schemes, to derive management recommendations for their ongoing conservation. We used acoustic detectors to quantify bat species richness, activity, and feeding in 32 linear remnants and adjacent fields across an agricultural region of New South Wales, Australia. Nocturnal arthropods were simultaneously trapped using black-light traps. We recorded 91,969 bat calls, 17,277 of which could be attributed to one of the 13 taxa recorded, and 491 calls contained feeding buzzes. The linear remnants supported higher bat activity than the fields, but species richness and feeding activity did not significantly differ. We trapped a mean 87.6 g (±17.6 g SE) of arthropods per night, but found no differences in biomass between land uses. Wider linear remnants with intact native vegetation supported more bat species, as did those adjacent to unsealed, as opposed to sealed roads. Fields of unimproved native pastures, with more retained scattered trees and associated hollows and logs, supported the greatest bat species richness and activity. We conclude that the juxtaposition of linear remnants of intact vegetation and scattered trees in fields, coupled with less-intensive land uses such as unimproved pastures will benefit bat communities in agricultural landscapes, and should be incorporated into agri-environment schemes. In contrast, sealed roads may act as a deterrent. The "wildlife friendly farming" vs "land sparing" debate has so far primarily focussed on birds, but here we have found evidence that the integration of both approaches could particularly benefit bats.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 218 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 3 1%
Australia 3 1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
Mexico 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 202 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 47 22%
Researcher 41 19%
Student > Master 34 16%
Other 18 8%
Student > Bachelor 18 8%
Other 30 14%
Unknown 30 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 99 45%
Environmental Science 62 28%
Social Sciences 5 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 1%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 <1%
Other 7 3%
Unknown 40 18%