| Title |
Importance of Thinking Locally for Mental Health: Data from Cross-Sectional Surveys Representing South East London and England
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, December 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0048012 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stephani L. Hatch, Charlotte Woodhead, Souci Frissa, Nicola T. Fear, Maria Verdecchia, Robert Stewart, Abraham Reichenberg, Craig Morgan, Paul Bebbington, Sally McManus, Traolach Brugha, Bwalya Kankulu, Jennifer L. Clark, Billy Gazard, Robert Medcalf, Matthew Hotopf |
| Abstract |
Reliance on national figures may be underestimating the extent of mental ill health in urban communities. This study demonstrates the necessity for local information on common mental disorder (CMD) and substance use by comparing data from the South East London Community Health (SELCoH) study with those from a national study, the 2007 English Adult Psychiatric Morbidity Study (APMS). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 50% |
| United States | 2 | 25% |
| South Africa | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 1 | 13% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 88% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 91 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 17 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 15% |
| Unknown | 20 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 21 | 23% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 17% |
| Social Sciences | 15 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 12% |
| Unknown | 22 | 24% |