↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Aging and Weight-Ratio Perception

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
Title
Aging and Weight-Ratio Perception
Published in
PLOS ONE, October 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0047701
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jessica S. Holmin, J. Farley Norman

Abstract

Past research has provided evidence that older adults have more difficulty than younger adults in discriminating small differences in lifted weight (i.e., the difference threshold for older adults is higher than that of younger adults). Given this result, one might expect that older adults would demonstrate similar impairments in weight ratio perception (a suprathreshold judgment) compared to younger adults. The current experiment compared the abilities of younger and older adults to perceive weight ratios. On any given trial, participants lifted two objects in succession and were asked to provide an estimate of the objects' weight ratio (the weight of the heavier object relative to the lighter). The results showed that while the older participants' weight ratio estimates were as reliable as those of the younger participants, they were significantly less accurate: the older participants frequently perceived the weight ratios to be much higher than they actually were.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
United States 1 3%
Unknown 32 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 5 15%
Researcher 4 12%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 9%
Other 10 29%
Unknown 6 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 9 26%
Sports and Recreations 4 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 9%
Neuroscience 2 6%
Engineering 2 6%
Other 6 18%
Unknown 8 24%