↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Modulation of the Disturbed Motor Network in Dystonia by Multisession Suppression of Premotor Cortex

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
Title
Modulation of the Disturbed Motor Network in Dystonia by Multisession Suppression of Premotor Cortex
Published in
PLOS ONE, October 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0047574
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ying-Zu Huang, Chin-Song Lu, John C. Rothwell, Chung-Chuan Lo, Wen-Li Chuang, Yi-Hsin Weng, Szu-Chia Lai, Rou-Shayn Chen

Abstract

Daily sessions of therapeutic transcranial brain stimulation are thought to prolong or amplify the effect of a single intervention. Here we show in patients with focal hand dystonia that additional, new effects build up progressively over time, making it difficult to predict the effect of long term interventions from shorter treatment sessions. In a sham-controlled study, real or sham continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) was given once daily for five consecutive days to dorsolateral premotor cortex (PMd). Five days of real, but not sham, premotor cTBS improved intracortical inhibition in primary motor cortex (M1) to a similar extent on day 1 and day 5. However 5 days of cTBS were required to restore the abnormal PMd-M1 interactions observed on day 1. Similarly, excessive M1 plasticity seen at baseline was also significantly reduced by five days of real premotor cTBS. There was only a marginal benefit on writing. The results show that additional, new effects, at sites distant from the point of stimulation, build up progressively over time, making it difficult to predict the effect of long term interventions from shorter treatment sessions. The results indicate that it may take many days of therapeutic intervention to rebalance activity in a complex network.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
France 1 2%
Unknown 42 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 36%
Student > Master 4 9%
Professor 4 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Researcher 3 7%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 7 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 30%
Neuroscience 9 20%
Psychology 5 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 6 14%