↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Approaches to Brain Stress Testing: BOLD Magnetic Resonance Imaging with Computer-Controlled Delivery of Carbon Dioxide

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
Title
Approaches to Brain Stress Testing: BOLD Magnetic Resonance Imaging with Computer-Controlled Delivery of Carbon Dioxide
Published in
PLOS ONE, November 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0047443
Pubmed ID
Authors

W. Alan C. Mutch, Daniel M. Mandell, Joseph A. Fisher, David J. Mikulis, Adrian P. Crawley, Olivia Pucci, James Duffin

Abstract

An impaired vascular response in the brain regionally may indicate reduced vascular reserve and vulnerability to ischemic injury. Changing the carbon dioxide (CO(2)) tension in arterial blood is commonly used as a cerebral vasoactive stimulus to assess the cerebral vascular response, changing cerebral blood flow (CBF) by up to 5-11 percent/mmHg in normal adults. Here we describe two approaches to generating the CO(2) challenge using a computer-controlled gas blender to administer: i) a square wave change in CO(2) and, ii) a ramp stimulus, consisting of a continuously graded change in CO(2) over a range. Responses were assessed regionally by blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 61 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 22%
Student > Bachelor 7 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 9%
Student > Master 5 8%
Professor 5 8%
Other 14 22%
Unknown 13 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 41%
Neuroscience 8 13%
Engineering 5 8%
Psychology 5 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 12 19%