↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Impaired Attentional Disengagement from Stimuli Matching the Contents of Working Memory in Social Anxiety

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
Title
Impaired Attentional Disengagement from Stimuli Matching the Contents of Working Memory in Social Anxiety
Published in
PLOS ONE, October 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0047221
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jun Moriya, Yoshinori Sugiura

Abstract

Although many cognitive models in anxiety propose that an impaired top-down control enhances the processing of task-irrelevant stimuli, few studies have paid attention to task-irrelevant stimuli under a cognitive load task. In the present study, we investigated the effects of the working memory load on attention to task-irrelevant stimuli in trait social anxiety. The results showed that as trait social anxiety increased, participants were unable to disengage from task-irrelevant stimuli identical to the memory cue under low and high working memory loads. Impaired attentional disengagement was positively correlated with trait social anxiety. This impaired attentional disengagement was related to trait social anxiety, but not state anxiety. Our findings suggest that socially anxious people have difficulty in disengaging attention from a task-irrelevant memory cue owing to an impaired top-down control under a working memory load.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Canada 1 1%
Portugal 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
China 1 1%
Unknown 61 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 24%
Student > Master 15 22%
Student > Bachelor 7 10%
Researcher 6 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 9 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 43 64%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 6%
Neuroscience 3 4%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 13 19%