↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

The Effect of the California Tobacco Control Program on Smoking Prevalence, Cigarette Consumption, and Healthcare Costs: 1989–2008

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
9 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
63 X users
facebook
14 Facebook pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
Title
The Effect of the California Tobacco Control Program on Smoking Prevalence, Cigarette Consumption, and Healthcare Costs: 1989–2008
Published in
PLOS ONE, February 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0047145
Pubmed ID
Authors

James Lightwood, Stanton A. Glantz

Abstract

Previous research has shown that tobacco control funding in California has reduced per capita cigarette consumption and per capita healthcare expenditures. This paper refines our earlier model by estimating the effect of California tobacco control funding on current smoking prevalence and cigarette consumption per smoker and the effect of prevalence and consumption on per capita healthcare expenditures. The results are used to calculate new estimates of the effect of the California Tobacco Program.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 63 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
Netherlands 1 1%
Unknown 76 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 18%
Student > Master 11 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 9%
Professor 7 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 8%
Other 20 25%
Unknown 14 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 30%
Social Sciences 12 15%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 20 25%