↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Genomic Diversity of Escherichia Isolates from Diverse Habitats

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
96 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Genomic Diversity of Escherichia Isolates from Diverse Habitats
Published in
PLOS ONE, October 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0047005
Pubmed ID
Authors

Seungdae Oh, Sarah Buddenborg, Deborah R. Yoder-Himes, James M. Tiedje, Konstantinos T. Konstantinidis

Abstract

Our understanding of the Escherichia genus is heavily biased toward pathogenic or commensal isolates from human or animal hosts. Recent studies have recovered Escherichia isolates that persist, and even grow, outside these hosts. Although the environmental isolates are typically phylogenetically distinct, they are highly related to and phenotypically indistinguishable from their human counterparts, including for the coliform test. To gain insights into the genomic diversity of Escherichia isolates from diverse habitats, including freshwater, soil, animal, and human sources, we carried out comparative DNA-DNA hybridizations using a multi-genome E. coli DNA microarray. The microarray was validated based on hybridizations with selected strains whose genome sequences were available and used to assess the frequency of microarray false positive and negative signals. Our results showed that human fecal isolates share two sets of genes (n>90) that are rarely found among environmental isolates, including genes presumably important for evading host immune mechanisms (e.g., a multi-drug transporter for acids and antimicrobials) and adhering to epithelial cells (e.g., hemolysin E and fimbrial-like adhesin protein). These results imply that environmental isolates are characterized by decreased ability to colonize host cells relative to human isolates. Our study also provides gene markers that can distinguish human isolates from those of warm-blooded animal and environmental origins, and thus can be used to more reliably assess fecal contamination in natural ecosystems.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 91 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 24%
Researcher 17 18%
Student > Master 9 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 8%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Other 20 21%
Unknown 12 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 34 35%
Environmental Science 15 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 6%
Engineering 5 5%
Other 12 13%
Unknown 17 18%