↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Chip-Based Comparison of the Osteogenesis of Human Bone Marrow- and Adipose Tissue-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells under Mechanical Stimulation

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
190 Mendeley
Title
Chip-Based Comparison of the Osteogenesis of Human Bone Marrow- and Adipose Tissue-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells under Mechanical Stimulation
Published in
PLOS ONE, September 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0046689
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sang-Hyug Park, Woo Young Sim, Byoung-Hyun Min, Sang Sik Yang, Ali Khademhosseini, David L. Kaplan

Abstract

Adipose tissue-derived stem cells (ASCs) are considered as an attractive stem cell source for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. We compared human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) and hASCs under dynamic hydraulic compression to evaluate and compare osteogenic abilities. A novel micro cell chip integrated with microvalves and microscale cell culture chambers separated from an air-pressure chamber was developed using microfabrication technology. The microscale chip enables the culture of two types of stem cells concurrently, where each is loaded into cell culture chambers and dynamic compressive stimulation is applied to the cells uniformly. Dynamic hydraulic compression (1 Hz, 1 psi) increased the production of osteogenic matrix components (bone sialoprotein, oateopontin, type I collagen) and integrin (CD11b and CD31) expression from both stem cell sources. Alkaline phosphatase and Alrizarin red staining were evident in the stimulated hMSCs, while the stimulated hASCs did not show significant increases in staining under the same stimulation conditions. Upon application of mechanical stimulus to the two types of stem cells, integrin (β1) and osteogenic gene markers were upregulated from both cell types. In conclusion, stimulated hMSCs and hASCs showed increased osteogenic gene expression compared to non-stimulated groups. The hMSCs were more sensitive to mechanical stimulation and more effective towards osteogenic differentiation than the hASCs under these modes of mechanical stimulation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 190 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 2 1%
Germany 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 184 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 51 27%
Researcher 31 16%
Student > Master 21 11%
Student > Bachelor 15 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 5%
Other 31 16%
Unknown 31 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 42 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 29 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 8%
Materials Science 10 5%
Other 21 11%
Unknown 42 22%