↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Wood Densitometry in 17th and 18th Century Dutch, German, Austrian and French Violins, Compared to Classical Cremonese and Modern Violins

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
Title
Wood Densitometry in 17th and 18th Century Dutch, German, Austrian and French Violins, Compared to Classical Cremonese and Modern Violins
Published in
PLOS ONE, October 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0046629
Pubmed ID
Authors

Berend C. Stoel, Terry M. Borman, Ronald de Jongh

Abstract

Classical violins produced by makers such as Antonio Stradivari and Guarneri del Gesu have long been considered the epitome of the luthier's art and the expressive tool of choice for the most celebrated violinists. It has been speculated these makers had access to wood that was unique in some way and that this was responsible for their acclaimed tonal characteristics. In an attempt to discern whether the above conjecture is true, we analyzed 17 modern and classical Dutch, German, Austrian and French violins by wood densitometry using computed tomography and correlated these results with our previous study of modern and Cremonese violins; in all studying 30 instruments of the violin family. In order to make this comparison possible we developed methods to cross calibrate results from different CT manufacturers using calibration wood pieces. We found no significant differences in median densities between modern and classical violins, or between classical violins from different origins. These results suggest that it is unlikely classical Cremonese makers had access to wood with significantly different wood density characteristics than that available to contemporaneous or modern makers.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 35%
Student > Master 4 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 12%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 3 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Materials Science 7 27%
Engineering 4 15%
Physics and Astronomy 4 15%
Environmental Science 2 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 4 15%